Policy talk:Wikimedia Foundation Event Ban Policy
Appearance
(Redirected from Policy talk:Event Ban policy/Process)
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Quiddity (WMF) in topic Policy:Event ban policy/Process/10, 27, 79
This page is for discussions related to the Policy:Wikimedia Foundation Event Ban Policy page. Please remember to:
Archives: 1 |
Could you define "safe" as used in "safe mental space"?
"Safe physical space" is pretty easy to understand, but "safe mental space" is open to interpretation. I started a thread on Friendly space policy to ask about the definition of "offensive", and suggest that it be defined more specifically, and concurrently with defining this usage of "safe". Klortho (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- In case it's not clear, I'm suggesting to discuss there. Klortho (talk) 16:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I fear that, following the protracted and inconculsive parallel discussions on a similar topic at mw:Code of Conduct/Draft, still under way after a year, there will be no clear definition of "safe" or "offensive". There is a very real risk that in the absence of a clear definition, the allegation will in practice be used, or rather abused, by whoever can shout loudest, or earliest, or longest, in a dispute, or whoever has the most status, or supporters, irrespective of the merits or otherwise of the case. Rogol Domedonfors (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I knew there must have been a mother-lode discussion that I was missing, and Talk:CoC/Draft doesn't disappoint: 36,000 words! Thanks. Klortho (talk) 22:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I opened a topic on Code of Conduct/Draft. Klortho (talk) 23:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I knew there must have been a mother-lode discussion that I was missing, and Talk:CoC/Draft doesn't disappoint: 36,000 words! Thanks. Klortho (talk) 22:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I fear that, following the protracted and inconculsive parallel discussions on a similar topic at mw:Code of Conduct/Draft, still under way after a year, there will be no clear definition of "safe" or "offensive". There is a very real risk that in the absence of a clear definition, the allegation will in practice be used, or rather abused, by whoever can shout loudest, or earliest, or longest, in a dispute, or whoever has the most status, or supporters, irrespective of the merits or otherwise of the case. Rogol Domedonfors (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Policy:Event ban policy/Process/10, 27, 79
Please apply 'tvar' tags Rebulka (talk) 19:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Now done. Sorry we missed this earlier. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Broken tvar
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add a closing tvar to tvar number 3 in T:79. Thanks, --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed (and updated in the German and Czech translations), thank you for the note! Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 21:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
