Policy talk:Terms of Use
![]() | Editing of this talk page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled to counter excessive vandalism. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request an edit or unprotection, or log in from an autoconfirmed account. Please see the "Give feedback" page for more information on contacting the Wikimedia Foundation or Wikimedia projects. |
Does ToU require that Wikiprojects update license?
On n:Wikinews:Water_cooler/policy#Update_of_license there is a discussion if Wikinews have to update to CC-BY-SA-4.0 or if it is okay to keep using CC-BY-2.5 or another license.
Perhaps someone from WMF could have a look and clarify if the ToU require that license is updated or not? --MGA73 (talk) 10:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MGA73: FYI: Policy_talk:Terms_of_Use/Archive_2#Wikinews,_marketing_company_mediation The default move to CC BY SA 4.0 would not affect any project that expressly chooses to have a different licensing scheme [...] Wikinews and Wikidata's communities will keep their bespoke licensing schemes unless the communities choose otherwise. SCP-2000 (talk) 17:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Okay thank you! --MGA73 (talk) 09:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
@SCP-2000 and GVarnum-WMF: English Wikinews have discussed and would like to update to 4.0 but would like all WN to update so they can still share/translate articles.
Can you or anyone else tell how the update can happen?
It seems that n:en:MediaWiki:Copyrightwarning is the place to change.
But I noticed that n:en:MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyrightwarning already mention 4.0 and n:en:MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyright mention 3.0.
So to do this right I would like to know where to make changes.
I hope that if I can tell all versions of Wikinews that if they change <list of places to change> it will be easier to make everyone change. And at the same time. --MGA73 (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know pages like n:en:Wikinews:Copyright, n:en:Template:Copyvio and n:en:Wikinews:Audio guide etc. should also be updated. Any search tips? --MGA73 (talk) 15:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @SSpalding (WMF) from Legal who may have more insight to offer. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Policy:Terms of Use/Frequently asked questions on paid contributions without disclosure/39, 12, 13
tags 'tvar' Rebulka (talk) 07:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Rebulka I've added tvars in 12 and 13.
- I believe the link in 39 and the other link in 13, are intended to be localized (when possible), so I left them as is.
- I also corrected (I believe) a misunderstanding in 13's Czech translation, which I request that you check to confirm, or fix as needed!
- Thanks again. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 19:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Rebulka (talk) 18:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Remove TOC numbering
Can you add template styles or CSS to remove the table of contents numbering on Timeless, etc.? This will prevent stuff like this:
1. Introduction 2. 1. Header 1 3. 2. Header 2
etc.
CSS:
#mw-content-text .tocnumber {
display: none;
}
Awesome Aasim (talk) 23:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- I tested this out and inclined to agree with your assessment that it is indeed annoying on a number of pages and this change makes sense for some of the themes. Thank you for the suggestion, @Awesome Aasim! I have gone ahead and implemented it into wiki's CSS. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 01:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Gebruik van citaatrecht
Zou Wikimedia haar standpunt omtrent het citaatrecht willen toelichten op Voorwaarden en beperkingen bij citeren? Wickey (talk) 11:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Indentation of list item
Under 4 ('Onthouden van bepaalde activiteiten'), the item 'Inbreuk plegen op intellectuele-eigendomsrechten' is not properly indented. I believe this is a HTML error. On lines 1048-1051, the dl
tag is closed, and the line : <b>Inbreuk plegen op intellectuele eigendomsrechten</b>
is inserted between p
tags, after which another dl
tag is opened. The line should instead be inserted after the next dd
tag and not formatted as a separate paragraph. Jeroen N (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Jeroen N: The page uses wikicode and not HTML - but I will look into this and see what I can find out. Thank you for letting us know! --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 18:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Jeroen N: Looks like a typo in the translation text - should be fixed now. Thank you for letting us know! --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 19:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! That's subtle. I hadn't noticed that a different Unicode character was used. Jeroen N (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Jeroen N: In my experience - a lot of display errors are subtle things like that. Keeps quality control work interesting. ;) --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 19:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! That's subtle. I hadn't noticed that a different Unicode character was used. Jeroen N (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Emphasize on Applied Economics resolving the ongoing economic challenges
The debate between macroeconomics and applied economics on how to handle the tariffs declared by the Trump administration focuses on the scope and approach each field brings to solving the issue.
Macroeconomics examines the broader picture, focusing on national and global economic trends, fiscal policies, and overall economic performance. It can provide insights into the potential impacts of tariffs on GDP, inflation, and employment rates. The perspective from macroeconomics would argue that the government should consider how tariffs fit into the global economic system, exploring the long-term consequences for trade, growth, and market equilibrium.
Applied economics, on the other hand, is more focused on solving specific, practical issues by using economic theories to address real-world problems. Applied economists would look at how these tariffs affect individual industries, sectors, and communities, such as manufacturing or agriculture. They can help create targeted solutions to mitigate the negative impacts on specific groups within Canada, including providing guidance on how businesses can adapt to changes in trade dynamics.
To effectively handle the current tariffs, the Government of Canada should include the right players in a task force, drawing expertise from both macroeconomists and applied economists.
Macroeconomists should be brought in to guide the broader strategic response to the tariffs, analyzing their potential impact on Canada's overall economic health and ensuring a cohesive approach across industries and regions.
Applied economists can provide the necessary granular insights to address the sector-specific impacts, recommending adaptive strategies for businesses affected by the tariffs.
Additionally, the taskforce should include:
Trade experts who understand the international trade landscape and can provide actionable recommendations on negotiating or responding to the tariffs. Industry representatives who can offer direct input on how the tariffs affect various sectors of the economy and the workforce.
Policy advisors from the public sector who can help design regulations and fiscal responses to minimize negative effects.
A balanced and comprehensive approach, leveraging the expertise of both fields, will provide the best strategy for Canada to manage and adapt to the shifting trade environment under the Trump administration's tariff policies. Farzana.1970 (talk) 08:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)